- Jan 7, 2025 - Negligent Security - Written by Cloward Trial Lawyers, reviewed by Ben Cloward
Request Free Consultation
call or text us 702-605-5000When it comes to personal injury cases, Ordinary Negligence Example scenarios often arise in negligent security claims. These are when property owners or managers fail to take reasonable security measures that result in an injury to a visitor or tenant. This could be anything from poor lighting in parking lots to poorly fitted locks on apartment doors or a lack of security personnel in high-risk areas. Understanding ordinary negligence protects your rights. At Cloward Trial Lawyers, we work to allow victims of negligent security in Las Vegas to focus on the most important things in trying to seek justice and fair compensation.
Ordinary negligence refers to the failure to act with the degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would have acted in the same circumstances. According to The Legal Information Institute, it is an action when someone has failed to be responsible to another individual, causing that person harm or injury. In a negligent security case, ordinary negligence might be defined by the property owner who failed to act reasonably in ways that placed visitors or residents at an undue risk.
There are four critical legal components that must be proven in any ordinary negligence claim:
The landowners are supposed to exercise reasonable care to ensure that the place is safe for visitors, residents, and customers. The Legal Information Institute says that this is in the form of taking reasonable security measures to avoid foreseeable harm.
A breach occurs when property owners fail to address known hazards, such as broken locks, poor lighting, or insufficient security staff.
The injury must be a direct result of the breach of duty. In other words, poor lighting in a parking garage results in an assault; therefore, the property owner is liable.
It shall be upon the victims to prove that actual harm was caused, which could be in the form of physical injury, emotional hurt, or financial loss. These could include medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional trauma.
Negligent security cases often involve ordinary negligence. Below are common examples:
Inadequate lighting creates an environment where criminal activities, such as assaults or robberies, can occur undetected. Property owners are responsible for ensuring parking areas are well-lit to deter such incidents. For example, a dimly lit parking garage with broken light fixtures can pose significant risks.
Establishments serving alcohol often require trained security staff to handle conflicts or prevent altercations. Failing to hire or properly train personnel can constitute ordinary negligence. For instance, if an altercation escalates due to a lack of security presence, the establishment may be held liable.
Property owners must ensure that apartment locks are functional. Broken or inadequate locks increase the risk of unauthorized access and harm to tenants. For example, if a tenant’s apartment is broken into due to a faulty lock, the landlord may be considered negligent.
Open access points without proper monitoring or security systems can lead to preventable incidents, such as theft or assaults. Shopping mall owners are responsible for ensuring these access points are secured.
To prove ordinary negligence in a negligent security case, one needs great evidence. This may include:
Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, a plaintiff in a negligent security case must establish that a property owner either failed to exercise reasonable care in discovering prior criminal activities or failed to give adequate warnings to prevent injury. Probably the most important factor is foreseeability, usually established if there were similar prior crimes at the exact location that the owner knew or should have known about.
Everyday examples of ordinary negligence include failing to stop at a stop sign and striking a pedestrian, failing to erect caution signs after mopping, and failing to repair broken stairs, which can result in injury.
Learn more about Cloward Trial Lawyers Top Negligent Security Case: $38 Million Verdict for Negligent Security: A Nevada Milestone
If you’ve been a victim of negligent security due to an Ordinary Negligence Example, contact Cloward Trial Lawyers (The Fierce Firm) today at 702-605-5000. We’re here to help you secure the compensation you deserve.
In 2016, at the age of 37, Benjamin P. Cloward became the youngest lawyer in the history of the State of Nevada to be awarded the prestigious “Trial Lawyer of the Year” by the Nevada Justice Association. That same year, he became the youngest member of the Nevada, Las Vegas Chapter of ABOTA (American Board of Trial Advocates), and at the time was also the youngest person in the State of Nevada to be Board Certified as a Personal Injury Specialist.
Practice areas: personal injury, car accidents, truck accidents, wrongful death, Greyhound bus accidents, and walk-in tub accidents.
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Start your Free Case Evaluation by using the form below. You’ll get a fast response from one of our team members or call our office 1-888-888-8888.
Explore Articles Related to Your Situation
Negligent security has devastating consequences for victims. An inadequate security lawsuit helps them seek justice and compensation from property owners due to preventable harm caused by a lack of safety precauti... read more
When navigating Nevada negligence law, particularly in the area of negligent security claims, understanding one's rights and options is paramount. Here at Cloward Trial Lawyers (The Fierce Firm), we are here to br... read more
In a negligence action, what standard do courts use to evaluate the actions of an individual? In resume: the reasonable person standard, a basic rule in negligence cases, is often used by courts to determine legal... read more
Start your Free Case Evaluation by using the form below. You’ll get a fast response from one of our team members or call our office 702-605-5000.